Blockchains
are secured through a variety of mechanisms that include advanced cryptographic
techniques and mathematical models of behavior and
decision-making. Blockchain technology is the underlying structure
of most cryptocurrency systems and is what prevents this kind of digital money
from being duplicated or destroyed.
The use
of blockchain technology is also being explored in other contexts where data
immutability and security are highly valuable. A few examples include the act
of recording and tracking charity donations,
medical databases, and supply chain management.
However,
blockchain security is far from being a simple subject. Therefore, it is
important to understand the basic concepts and mechanisms that grant robust
protection to these innovative systems.
The concepts of immutability and consensus
Although
many features play into the security associated with blockchain, two of the
most important are the concepts of consensus and immutability. Consensus refers
to the ability of the nodes within a distributed blockchain network to
agree on the true state of the network and on the validity of transactions.
Typically, the process of achieving consensus is dependent on the
so-called consensus algorithms.
Immutability,
on the other hand, refers to the ability of blockchains to prevent alteration
of transactions that have already been confirmed. Although these transactions
are often relating to the transfer of cryptocurrencies, they may also refer to
the record of other non-monetary forms of digital data.
Combined,
consensus and immutability provide the framework for data security in
blockchain networks. While consensus algorithms ensure that the rules of the
system are being followed and that all parties involved agree on the current
state of the network - immutability guarantees the integrity of data and
transaction records after each new block of data is confirmed to be valid.
The role of cryptography in blockchain security
Blockchains
rely heavily on cryptography to
achieve their data security. In this context, the so-called cryptographic hashing functions are of fundamental
importance. Hashing is a process whereby an algorithm (hash function) receives an input of
data of any size and returns an output (hash) that contains a predictable and fixed size (or
length).
Regardless
of the input size, the output will always present the same length. But if the
input changes, the output will be completely different. However, if the input
doesn’t change, the resulting hash will always be the same - no matter how many
times you run the hash function.
Within
blockchains, these output values, known as hashes, are used as unique
identifiers for data blocks. The hash of each block is generated in relation to the hash of the
previous block, and that is what creates a chain of linked blocks. The block
hash is dependent on the data contained within that block, meaning that any
change made to the data would require a change to the block hash.
Therefore,
the hash of each block is generated based on both the
data contained within that block and the hash of the previous block. These hash
identifiers play a major role in ensuring blockchain security and immutability.
Hashing
is also leveraged in the consensus algorithms used to validate transactions. On
the Bitcoin blockchain, for example, the Proof of Work (PoW) algorithm utilizes
a hash function called SHA-256. As the name implies, SHA-256 takes data input
and returns a hash that is 256 bits or 64 characters long.
In
addition to providing protection for transaction records on ledgers,
cryptography also plays a role in ensuring the security of the wallets used to
store units of cryptocurrency. The paired public and private keys that
respectively allow users to receive and send payments are created through the
use of asymmetric or public-key
cryptography. Private keys are used to generate digital signatures
for transactions, making it possible to authenticate ownership of the coins
that are being sent.
Though
the specifics are beyond the scope of this article, the nature of asymmetric
cryptography prevents anyone but the private key holder from accessing funds
stored in a cryptocurrency wallet, thus keeping those funds safe until the
owner decides to spend them (as long as the private key is not shared or
compromised).
Cryptoeconomics
In
addition to cryptography, a relatively new concept known as cryptoeconomics also
plays a role in maintaining the security of blockchain networks. It is related
to a field of study known as game theory, which
mathematically models decision-making by rational actors in situations with
predefined rules and rewards. While traditional game theory can
be broadly applied to a range of cases, cryptoeconomics specifically models and
describes the behavior of nodes on distributed blockchain systems.
In
short, cryptoeconomics is the study of the economics within blockchain
protocols and the possible outcomes that their design may present based on its
participants’ behavior. Security through cryptoeconomics is based on the notion
that blockchain systems provide greater incentives for nodes to act honestly
than to adopt malicious or faulty behaviors. Once again, the Proof of Work
consensus algorithm used in Bitcoin mining offers a
good example of this incentive structure.
When Satoshi Nakamoto created the framework for Bitcoin
mining, it was intentionally designed to be a costly and resource-intensive
process. Owing to its complexity and computational demands, PoW mining involves
a considerable investment of money and time - regardless of where and who the
mining node is. Therefore, such a structure provides a strong disincentive for
malicious activity and significant incentives for honest mining activity.
Dishonest or inefficient nodes will be quickly expelled from the blockchain
network, while the honest and efficient miners have the potential of getting
substantial block rewards.
Similarly,
this balance of risks and rewards also grants protection against potential attacks
that could undermine consensus by placing the majority hash rate of a blockchain network into the hands
of a single group or entity. Such attacks, known as 51 percent attacks,
could be extremely damaging if successfully executed. Due to the
competitiveness of Proof of Work mining and the magnitude of the Bitcoin
network, the likelihood of a malicious actor gaining control of a majority of
nodes is extremely minimal.
Furthermore,
the cost in computing power needed to attain 51 percent control of a huge
blockchain network would be astronomical, providing an immediate disincentive
to make such a large investment for a relatively small potential reward. This
fact contributes to a characteristic of blockchains known as Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT),
which is essentially the ability of a distributed system to continue to work
normally even if some nodes become compromised or act maliciously.
As long
as the cost of establishing a majority of malicious nodes remains prohibitive
and better incentives exist for honest activity, the system will be able to
thrive without significant disruption. It is worth noting, however, that small
blockchain networks are certainly susceptible to majority attack because the
total hash rate devoted to those systems is considerably lower than the one of
Bitcoin.
Closing thoughts
Through
the combined use of game theory and cryptography, blockchains are able to
attain high levels of security as distributed systems. As with nearly all
systems, however, it is critical that these two fields of knowledge are
properly applied. A careful balance between decentralization and security is
vital to building a reliable and effective cryptocurrency network.
As the
uses of blockchain continue to evolve, their security systems will also change
in order to meet the needs of different applications. The private blockchains
now being developed for business enterprises, for example, rely much more on
security through access control than on the game theory mechanisms
(or cryptoeconomics) that are indispensable to the safety of most public
blockchains.
No comments:
Post a Comment